<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Monotype Corsiva";
panose-1:3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
{font-family:Roboto;}
@font-face
{font-family:Lato;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
p.HTMLBody, li.HTMLBody, div.HTMLBody
{mso-style-name:"HTML Body";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-autospace:none;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><u>Location</u>: </b><b><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Zoom ONLY</span>
</b><a href="https://fsu.zoom.us/j/878209172"><b>https://fsu.zoom.us/j/878209172</b></a><b>
</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="HTMLBody" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:18.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Monotype Corsiva"">O<u>ceanography Seminar</u></span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="HTMLBody" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:18.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Monotype Corsiva"">Arvind Shantharam</span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="HTMLBody" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:18.0pt;font-family:"Monotype Corsiva"">PhD Oceanography Candidate</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><u>Title</u>:</b> <span style="font-family:Roboto;color:#333333">
SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF BENTHIC BIODIVERSITY IN THE GULF OF MEXICO: EMPHASIS ON THE DESOTO CANYON</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><u>Major Professor</u>: Dr. Amy Baco-Taylor</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><u>Date</u>:</b> March 25, 2020
<b><u>Time</u>: 9:00 AM</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="HTMLBody"><span style="font-size:8.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><u>Location</u>: Zoom </b><a href="https://fsu.zoom.us/j/878209172"><b>https://fsu.zoom.us/j/878209172</b></a><b>
</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><b>ABSTRACT</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Lato;color:#232333;background:white">Despite being a known benthic biological hotspot and environmental ecotone, the DeSoto Canyon has hardly been characterized for its benthic diversity and community
structure. Moreover, it is a known deposition and impact zone due to hydrocarbon pollution from the Deepwater Horizon (DwH). As part of a project to evaluate the impact of the DwH blowout and characterize the ecological patterns throughout, both spatially
and temporally, macrofauna (seafloor-inhabiting organisms ≥ 300 µm) were sampled within the canyon and on the adjacent slope. Five stations within the canyon, from 2012 – 2014, and from two stations between 2013 – 2014 on the adjacent open slope, were used
for analysis of interannual dynamics, and temporal variability in the face of the DwH. Elevated abundance was observed at the start of the time-series for overall macrofauna and deposit feeder abundance. However, diversity metrics showed no difference within
stations among timepoints. Community and feeding guild structure varied by station, as expected, but showed no statistical difference among time points within a station. Cluster analyses for these two metrics showed grouping more by station than by time point,
but some temporal variability was noted in temporal trajectory overlays. Metrics designed for measuring oil contamination impact and overall community stress including the benthic polychaete/amphipod ratio, feeding guild abundance, macrofaunal indicators designed
from the DwH, and community dispersion, generally exhibited a paucity of evidence of impact, both yearly and with site-to-site comparisons. This suggests low to moderate levels of impact in the canyon consistent with the low deposition of hydrocarbons, timing
of sampling, and quick recovery of canyon foraminifera. Taken together these results suggest relatively low levels of temporal variability within the DeSoto Canyon, with little evidence of the influence of oil on these sites within the studied time range.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Lato;color:#232333;background:white">Macrofauna from 13 stations along the canyon wall and axis, and on the adjacent slope, were sampled along with sediment, terrain, and water mass parameters. Within
the canyon, abundance and species richness decreased with depth, while evenness increased. Cluster analysis identified three depth-related groups within the canyon that conformed to previously established bathymetric boundaries: stations at 464 – 485 m, 669
– 1834 m, and > 2000 m. Abundance differed between depth groups. Species richness was lowest for the deepest group and evenness was lowest for the shallowest. Community structure within the canyon most related to fluorometry and oxygen saturation, combined
with any of salinity, particulate organic carbon, sediment organic carbon, or slope.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Lato;color:#232333;background:white">Canyon wall abundances were higher than the canyon axis or adjacent slope. Community structure differed between all three habitat types. Ordination of community
structure suggests a longitudinal pattern that potentially tracks with increasing sea-surface chlorophyll that occurs in the eastward direction across the northern GOM. Canyon and slope differences may result from seasonal water masses entrained by canyon
topography characterized by high salinity, oxygen saturation, fluorometry, and turbidity. Higher fluorescence and turbidity in the canyon did not translate into higher sediment organic matter. Flushing along canyon wall channels and the canyon axis may explain
the low organic matter. Differences in abundance and structure between the canyon wall and axis may result from microhabitat heterogeneity due to potential hydrocarbon seepage, organically enriched sediment deposits along channels, or remnant influence from
the DwH blowout.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Lato;color:#232333;background:white">The Biodiversity of the Gulf of Mexico (BioGoMx) database, which contains occurrence information of extant species in the GOM, allows for the analysis of benthic
mollusc diversity and distribution across the entire basin. For analyses, the GOM was split in 4 geographic sectors (NE, NW, SE, and SW) and 6 depth classes (inshore, upper shelf, lower shelf, upper slope, lower slope, and abyssal plain) for a total of 24
geographic-depth polygons. The northern GOM contained higher species richness than the south, the east more than the west. Species richness decreased with depth with maxima occurring on the upper shelf. Bivalves and gastropods dominated each geographic sector
and depth class, together comprising >90% of the molluscan species richness. Assemblages were structured by depth more than by geographic sector. GOM molluscs fell into 3 broad depth-based assemblages: the inshore and continental shelf, the continental slope,
and the abyssal plain species combined with the western lower slope. Geographically, taxonomic distinctness analysis indicated most NE depths fell below average distinctness and by depth polygons above and below the continental shelf break were frequently
distinct. Cluster analysis based on taxonomic dissimilarity agreed with the analyses based on the species occurrence data. Mollusc feeding strategies largely followed estimated proportions for the larger Atlantic. Carnivory and suspension feeding were the
most common with grazing, herbivory, and parasitism following behind. Chemosymbiotic species were also prevalent due to the widespread occurrence of cold seep habitats. Further taxonomic research and more sampling are needed to determine patterns at finer
scales.sis based on taxonomic dissimilarity agreed with the analyses based on the species occurrence data. Mollusc feeding strategies largely followed estimated proportions for the larger Atlantic. Carnivory and suspension feeding were the most common with
grazing, herbivory, and parasitism following behind. Chemosymbiotic species were also prevalent due to the widespread occurrence of cold seep habitats. Further taxonomic research and more sampling are needed to determine patterns at finer scales.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>